Want to keep up to date on the latest happenings at DNP123? Subscribe to our newsletter.

Want to keep up to date on the latest happenings at DNP123? Subscribe to our newsletter.

Tell us a bit about yourself and your background. What are you most passionate about?
I am a native Tulsan, and I started the company in the place where I was born. I'm passionate about other people and other entrepreneurs blooming where they are planted as well. As an entrepreneur and founder, I’m also passionate about giving people a good and respectful place to work. I didn’t realize before founding the company that people spend a lot of time in jobs in which this often isn’t the case. At Ten-Nine Tech, we focus on maintaining a respectful workplace and a place that rewards our team members for what they do. This allows them to express themselves and be the best at their jobs, and it has a lot to do with living a good and happy life overall. It's been surprising, even heartwarming, and important to me as a person, to feel as though I enable other people to achieve that in their workplace.

You’re the founder and CEO of Ten-Nine Technologies. What are you hoping to accomplish through Ten-Nine Tech?
I have two missions. The first is to develop and deliver the world's most powerful battery materials. We have to be a part of revolutionizing the electrification of the energy economy by making batteries work better. Batteries are a foundational tool for almost all other sustainable technologies. Reliable, renewable energy delivery depends on batteries, and batteries make an enormous difference in the life that we live every day. Most people think about battery life in terms of their cell phone, or an EV, but batteries are far more important in developing countries where they're running things – like light for a child to do their homework or an incubator to keep a baby alive. Batteries truly are one of those fundamental technologies that make a real-life difference to people around the world. And the second mission of Ten-Nine Tech is to build better batteries in a respectful workplace driven by our values of curiosity, generosity, and authenticity.

To date, what’s been Ten-Nine Tech’s biggest success?
Our biggest success to date is a scientific one - we were the first people to demonstrate fossil-fuel parity in a battery material. We developed a new material that is capable of delivering as much energy from the electrical reactions created in the battery material as can be garnered from combustion reactions in the burning of gasoline. That was an extremely significant demonstration, as no other batteries had come within a fraction of that sort of energy delivery, or energy density as we call it. Ever since then we've been working on how to practically use those energetic materials in batteries to make them perform better.

Why was it important to found your own company rather than working at an existing company? And what are some of the benefits and disadvantages of working at a startup versus working at an established company?
Let me tell you the story of how the company was started. I was approached by an angel investor while I was still working in academia who said, “you can't do what you need to do at a university,” and he was absolutely right! Universities do good things, but they're not set up to reach the marketplace or to make change in the marketplace. I think it’s important to recognize that. I've worked in academic, industry, and philanthropic settings, and I’ve learned that if you really want to change the world, you need to be in the marketplace. And the best way to do that is to found your own company. In addition, like many women I’ve found it very difficult to find a respectful and supportive work environment within existing companies. This is mainly because - for better or worse – existing companies (and universities, for that matter) were founded originally by men, and they were set up in ways that men found comfortable and appealing and that worked for them. It’s no wonder that women often find that existing workplaces don't work well for them. For me, it's been great to create a place in which the culture is respectful from the very beginning. It wasn't like we were trying to correct problems that other people set up. You're not trying to paint a door pink to get more women through it. You're just getting rid of the door and making a new entry. That’s one of the biggest advantages of founding your own company and building your workplace from scratch.

What advice would you give to a student who thinks they might want to start their own company someday?
I would encourage students who want to be founders to work at a startup. I certainly had an extraordinarily naive view of starting a business when I began in 2014. I've been able to overcome that deficit, but I would advise anyone to have a little more visibility on what a startup company looks like. One way to do that is to get an internship with a founder in your own community and bloom where you're planted. Don't think you have to go to Silicon Valley, or even work in the same type of company that you think you might start. But get a summer job with a start-up to see a glimpse of that world. Ask if you can shadow the founder - if you can sit down and talk to them about what the difficulties have been and how you should plan. Being on the inside somewhere and hearing from a founder who has walked that road is important. I’ve also found that once you start down that road, if you're a responsible person, you're very committed almost to the level of marriage or parenting. You are tied to that effort. It’s not something to take at all lightly but something to go into with seriousness and understanding. Learning from others will keep you from burning out or not being able to make and keep the commitments that you need to as a founder.

In an interview with Startland News, you noted a commitment to creating opportunities for women at Ten-Nine. What are the biggest hurdles facing women in technology startups?
The challenge for a woman founder is almost always that there are only women on one side of the table – and she’s the person asking for money or asking for a job, rather than the one handing out the money or hiring. When all of the managers or capital providers are men, that's never going to be a fair and equitable situation. Those men can be kind, they can see themselves as allies of women and advocates for women, but it is not an equivalent situation. The best way to overcome this huge hurdle is to get women on both sides of the table. When there are women on both sides of the table, whether that's a woman providing capital or a female founder interviewing for positions in a tech company, then opportunities for women will really change. The biggest outcome of not having women on the other side of the table is that women who found companies receive only two percent of the venture capital funding today. So, the biggest hurdle for women founders is simply getting capital. It means that you will have to pitch twice as many times as a man. You will have to answer twice as many questions, and it will take you twice as long. So right now, unfortunately, it's important for female founders to plan for that. I hope this will get better over time, but today, as a woman in technology, you must plan for what we know to be true.

One of the things I found fascinating about your bio was your breadth of curiosity including everything from children’s playgrounds to atomic gardening. Tell us a bit about your non-professional interests.
That's a lovely way to state it – “breadth of curiosity!” You know, of course, that curiosity is one of the company’s three core values. I find that because I'm a curious person, I want to create a company culture that's like myself in that way. Curiosity is obviously a key component of my personality and it's something we look for in the people that come to work for Ten-Nine Tech. I ask potential employees if they have a passionate second interest, and, as you noted, I have multiple passionate second interests. I often tell people that I have a hungry mind that works best when it is engaging with knowledge rather deeply. For years before I started a company I was blogging about children's playgrounds and the history of gardens. While I was still at the university, I was able to maintain all those interests and write about all those interests. I do love to write, which is something that has served me very well. As a founder, there's a little bit of additional advice to people wanting to start a company - you need to be a good writer. When you are early stage, you have to write your own press releases, your own ad copy, your own grants, your own reports, and your own board materials. Being a good communicator goes along ways towards giving you that additional boost toward success. Now about my non-professional interests - I love the creation of a space for people to inhabit. I love gardens. I love landscapes whether they are atomic gardens or children's playgrounds. I love to understand how humans deal with nature and utilize nature to create and inhabit space.

The last question is something we like to ask all our interviewees. If you had to hire a nanobot to do a job for you, what would the job be?
Because I like to delve deeply into things, I always have a far greater reading load than I can manage - from scientific papers related to batteries and nanotechnology to garden and history books. I've always said that my superpower would be to be able to touch a book and consume the knowledge in it immediately. As a lover of knowledge, I would hire a nanobot to read for me.

Paige, thank you so much for taking the time to talk with us today! Good luck making our electric future a reality!

Want to keep up to date on the latest happenings at DNP123? Subscribe to our newsletter.

Tell us a bit about yourself. What are you most passionate about?
Hmm! I'm probably most passionate about enabling helpers and joy. This comes from a perspective of mortality and pessimism: I've got probably under 50 years of being able to do stuff, and there are lots of problems locally and globally that I feel powerless to fix. One tangible facet of being an educator, however, is empowering people to solve problems and teach, too, and that makes me hopeful some big problems get solved. It's also easy to forget that hilarious things are ubiquitous, and there's joy to be found in finding them, in discovering things, in helping others in spite of things not being perfect. I think it's very important to experience joy, especially in ostensibly "professional" settings, in order to do sustained work on hard problems.

One of your research goals is to “leverage thermodynamics for societal good”. What are some examples of this?
The sorts of things my team is trying to do include projects like discovering chemicals that are good ingredients for inexpensive solar panels, and understanding how the polymers used to make aircraft composites can be used to make stronger, lighter, more efficient aircraft at lower cost. In both cases, the properties of the materials, whether they're strong enough for airplanes or good at converting light into electricity, depends on how the molecules making the materials are arranged. The laws of thermodynamics govern how those molecules arrange themselves when we mix them together, and so we work hard to understand how to exploit those laws to work for us when making new materials. But the ultimate goal of the new materials we aim to invent is for them to be easy to make without harming the planet, reliable, and useful in helping people live safely and sustainably.

Experimentalists typically run experiments in labs to test how materials work. Theoreticians do calculations to predict how materials work. How would you describe how computational scientists work? Is it more experimental or theoretical?
There's wide variance in whether computational scientists lean more experimental and theoretical, and it's possible to do lots of both! Most of the time on my team, the work we do is more experimental: We set up an experiment using a computer, perform the experiment, and have a look at the results in the same way that someone using a fume hood or glove box might. We can do more experiments in a shorter amount of time, often, but when we're not working with theory to develop new kinds of experiments, we're mostly performing experiments using computers as the apparatus. 

High-performance computing using graphics cards dramatically expanded they types of simulations scientists can do. With the rise of machine learning and the potential coming of quantum computing, what do you predict materials research will look like in 10 to 20 years?
There's potential, and I am hopeful, that many arduous, important, but uncreative tasks will have been replaced with fast computations. For example, the creation and evaluation of the rules by which atoms interact in simulations is something we set up by hand right now, is very fiddly, and there's no fundamental reason we couldn't train a machine to do this for us. It looks like there's great potential for quantum computers to assist with the prediction of the electronic structure of molecules, which would put a whole set of techniques out of business. But I don't have a good sense for, theoretically, whether some fundamental problems in materials science are as "easy" as playing go for teachable machines. In 2015, I thought computers beating top professional players at go was 10 years away, and it happened in 2016. The successes of AlphaFold are super inspiring and I'm hopeful to see something similar be usable in predicting the structure of, say, polymer materials, for example. In summary, I think that in the next two decades it should be a lot easier to to predict the structure of materials from their ingredients, and because of this, those that can predict properties from structures or those that can figure out how to synthesize those structures will be even more sought after. 

The description in your Twitter account lists bikes and Go as interests in addition to science. How important is it to have interests outside science? Do these interests ever overlap with your research?
Without some balance it's possible to ruin anything. Like, eating one slice of pizza is great, but having to eat 500 in one sitting is terrible. The research I do gives me time away from riding bikes, which gives me time away from playing go. I love doing all of those things, but if could only do one of them I expect I'd have under 20 years of attention before I burned out at it. So they're different enough that I can get a break from one when doing another, but there's a ton of overlap between them! Fixing bikes and debugging code are identical processes on different machines. Finding the best move on a go board and finding the energy-minimizing structure of a polymer are essentially equivalent mathematically.  Winning a bike race and go tournament both require training, strategy, and split-second decision-making. In all three cases you can be a professional, and my experiences interacting with experts in each domain inform how I think about teaching, mentoring, competition, and supporting communities in the others.  

How would students describe what it’s like to work on your research team?
You should ask the students on our team! I hope they'd say it's a fun, supportive, interesting place to work and learn.

If you had to give a high school student interested in STEM careers advice, what would you say?
There are a ton of different careers that scientists, engineers, and mathematicians can do, and many of them you'll find interesting and fulfilling. Find them and do them, we need you! It's also a sad truth that many of the systems and practices in STEM education make students feel excluded from their classes, departments, and universities. Universities aren't immune to sexism or racism, and there's a lot of work to be done to make STEM opportunities more equitable. If you feel like sexism or racism hasn't mattered to your education so far, I'd invite you to use that privilege to help effect change. Reading broadly around the history of science and education is just as important as reading broadly about the the topics that got you interested in STEM careers.

If you had to hire a nanobot to do a job for you, what would the job be?
Delete emails before they reach my inbox? Haha, no, maybe turn things off that are wasting energy? OK. So, nanobot, huh? I'm interpreting "nano" as some things whose size is less than say 500nm, and "bot" to mean things that are programmable. So this is like 10x to 100x smaller than a red blood cell, so it'd be great to have some in my arteries disposing of plaque, allowing me to eat as much jamon iberico I want. But if we can program trillions of them to build more of each other, who can place the molecules in the right places for custom materials, then we're done, right? This is a tall order, though, because I know how hard it is to program things correctly, and how fiddly things are at nanometer scales, so I worry that half-reasoned attempts to do this end up causing more havoc than good.

Eric, thanks so much for taking time to talk with us! I look forward to reading your future publications!

Want to keep up to date on the latest happenings at DNP123? Subscribe to our newsletter.

Want to keep up to date on the latest happenings at DNP123? Subscribe to our newsletter.

Want to keep up to date on the latest happenings at DNP123? Subscribe to our newsletter.

Want to keep up to date on the latest happenings at DNP123? Subscribe to our newsletter.

Tell us a bit about yourself. What inspired you toward a career in nanoscience?

Since a kid, I have always been passionate about design and engineering. When my friends were drawing Batman cartoons, I was drawing modifications to the Batmobile. After graduate school in Chemical Biology studying pathways involved in cancer, I wanted to move into more engineering and design. I wanted to solve problems, not just ask questions. As I was trained in biochemistry and specifically DNA structure and function, nanotechnology was an obvious application of my expertise to an engineering problem.

This past semester, you did undergraduate research with your organic chemistry lab students. Why is undergraduate research important? What challenges arise when conducting research with students?

Undergraduate research is about gaining appreciation for the material you are learning. Simply, putting it use. The most difficult part of undergraduate research is gaining independence. Independence takes time to develop and is a difficult journey of learning how to ask the right questions and plan ahead. When working with students, I am constantly trying to find a balance between guidance and independence. Especially early in their journey to independence, students need close guidance. The difficult part is finding the right time to step back and let them start to work independently. Again, this is a long process and the earlier students can start on the path toward independent scientist, the more they can accomplish.

What questions were you hoping to answer this semester?

My goal with research in the undergraduate classes is to provide appreciation for the science the students are learning. The current students have been embroiled in several years of the COVID pandemic disrupting their life, and I wanted to ensure that the students are connecting the science they are learning to their daily lives. In the lab section of the class, we worked on a genetic test for HIV mutations. Similarly to the coronavirus, HIV can mutate. A predominant mutation, G48V allows HIV to function in the presence of commonly used protease inhibitors therapies. In the lab section of the class, I showed the students how to coat DNA onto surfaces like glass to make a common bioassay for identifying G48V mutant HIV.

You yourself were once an undergraduate research student at Simpson. If you had to go back in time, what career advice would you give 18-year-old Derek?

Network more. Solving real problems requires a wide range of skill sets and viewpoints. I have found the most success in my career collaborating.

Is there any additional advice you'd give students looking to do research today?

Get involved in research as early as possible. Research provides an application to what you are learning and will certainly guide you to finding a true passion, a place to focus your attention in the vast world of science. Discovering your passion project requires many misadventures along the way to find the magical combination of a problem that you care about that matches your skill set, interests, and available resources.

Last Question: If you had to hire a nanobot to do a job for you, what job would you hire it to do?

I live in suburbia, which roughly translates into the "land of beautiful landscaping". The harder I work on my making my yard look good, the worse it gets. I need some nanobots to help - maximize soil nutrients, minimize invasive weed species.

Derek, thank you so much for taking time to catch us up on your work!

Want to keep up to date on the latest happenings at DNP123? Subscribe to our newsletter.

I write science fiction and fantasy—mostly novels, but short stories too—and I’m best known for my high-tech science fiction. I live in Hawaii; it’s where I grew up and went to school. Quoting from my author bio, I’ve been a writer, a mom, a programmer of database-driven websites, and an independent publisher. What am I passionate about? Well, the world, this world, the most interesting world there is, the only known living planet, the planet to which we are exquisitely adapted—yet so many of us fail to appreciate this amazing, beautiful, irreplaceable world, threatened now by global warming and an ongoing loss of biodiversity, and by war, and runaway technology. 

What sparked your interest in science and science fiction?

My dad was big into popular science—through TV and books—and that interest rubbed off on me. At the same time, I loved to read, and I loved adventure stories. The stories could be set in the wilderness, on a sailing ship, the seashore, or someone’s backyard—it didn’t matter. I was into it. It was an easy step from there to science fiction, especially since my dad loved the genre and always had books around.

You’ve been described as one of the pioneers of nanopunk fiction. What is nanopunk, and would you consider it an accurate description of your work?
 
It’s nice to be considered a pioneer, but nanopunk isn’t a term I use. I mean, most of my stuff is not very “punk.” I like the terms nanotech or biotech science fiction better, though granted those terms are not nearly as catchy!

What prompted you to write The Nanotech Succession series? What was it about nanotechnology that drew your interest?

Like so many people back then, I was inspired by K. Eric Drexler’s Engines of Creation–and I also knew just enough about biology and biochemistry to recognize that we are made up of naturally evolved nanomachines. So maybe some of this stuff was possible? And if it was, what then? That question was the seed from which the entire series grew.

Personally, I love the realism of your more unlikable characters. I’d say “villains”, but I’m not sure that’s the correct word, since they have a lot more complexity and depth of motivation than a typical movie baddie who just wants to destroy the world. I’m thinking of characters like Roxanne in Tech Heaven or Kirsten Adair in The Bohr Maker. How do you go about creating characters like that? Do you base them off real people? Perhaps an old boss?

I call them antagonists—and they all have their own story. In the two books you mentioned, the protagonists are exploring the bleeding edge of technology, pushing the envelope as far as they can. The antagonists are there as a foil, a means to make the protagonists’ quest more difficult, but also to represent an opposing view. There are a lot of reasons to legitimately oppose what the “heroes” are up to in these books. A good antagonist lets me explore issues from multiple points of view, exposing the positive and the negative. Kirsten Adair is cruel and brutal, but she’s got legitimate concerns. And Roxanne—I love Roxanne. She’s my secret hero because though she behaves badly, she’s mostly right.

One of our missions is to promote STEM and nanotechnology. Many of my colleagues attribute their initial interest in science to Star Trek or other science fiction works. Sci-fi and fantasy writers seem to be better than professional scientists at generating interest in STEM. What are some things science fiction writers can teach professional scientists about communicating effectively?

 “Sense of wonder” is a term often used in conjunction with science fiction, though only a segment of the genre is really interested in trying to evoke it. Still, I think that’s one key to capturing the interest of bright kids who might go on to do good things for the world. Try to communicate the sense of wonder that led you to your work, along with a can-do sense of the possible. This world is facing a lot of serious problems. Give young people reason to believe the research and problem-solving is all worthwhile.

Looking at science fiction from the 1950’s and 60’s, it seems like people at that time had a much more optimistic view of science and technology. For example, a lot of comic book heroes created at the time—characters like Tony Stark, Reed Richards, and Janet Van Dyne—were scientists or engineers. Star Trek depicted a life beyond the stars that included equal opportunities for people of all genders and cultures. I worry we’ve lost that sense of hope, because a lot science fiction created today is pretty dystopian. Scientists in today’s movies are usually the bad guys. Do you have any sense for what caused that shift? 

In part, I think, people are just more cynical and more aware that things go wrong. They know science does not always improve the world. Three things that popped into my head when I first read this question were DDT, Agent Orange, and nuclear war. All were huge concerns in that era. There was also a sense of hubris. I do think there are more good movies and shows these days dealing with STEM topics. For All Mankind is a recent one that really impressed me.

It’s interesting to look back at older science fiction and see how accurately it anticipated the future. Early writers envisioned a lot of the technologies we have today, but they often got things dramatically wrong. (I’m always amazed by the amount of smoking in Asimov books.) As you look back at some of your earlier work, are there any technologies that past-you would be impressed to learn she forecasted correctly? Are there any technologies she’d wish she had predicted?

I’ll leave it to readers to decide what I got right, but two things that have profoundly influenced the degree of difficulty in writing near-future fiction (things I didn’t struggle so much with in the early days) are the ubiquity of smart phones and surveillance cameras. Wow, those two things can drain the suspense right out of a lot of potentially dramatic situations! :-)

Last Question: If you had to hire a nanobot to do a job for you, what job would you hire it to do?

Ha! Every now and then, when I have an especially frustrating day getting basic technology to work properly, I pause and wonder if we’ll ever reach the point where we’ll trust the really tricky stuff to work. But just a single nanobot, huh? So many possibilities! Do I go with health? Or environment? I can’t decide!

Linda, thank you so much for taking the time to talk with us today! We look forward to reading your future work. If you'd like read more from Linda, you can find her books through various book sellers listed on her website.

Want to keep up to date on the latest happenings at DNP123? Subscribe to our newsletter.